When would you consider switching to or adding on a PCSK9 inhibitor to lipid-lowering therapy following hospital discharge for acute coronary syndrome, in light of the results of the VICTORION-INCEPTION trial, provided LDL is still not at goal?
If LDL levels remain above 70 mg/dl during subsequent outpatient follow-up visits for patients with CAD and recent acute coronary syndrome, when would you consider adding a PCSK9 inhibitor to standard lipid-lowering therapy?
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
I don’t think the trial really changed my mind on this. I never really worried about not having ACS patients in the original phase 3 trials, so I had already been using inclisiran when I could in recent ACS patients.
I would never switch from a statin to a PCSK9i. Statins are cheap, effective, and w...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
The VICTORION-INCEPTION trial looked at LDL-lowering with inclisiran following AMI. I don't know that it enhanced my knowledge or toolkit - as I would have assumed this to be the case - inclisiran offers further LDL-lowering (~40% reduction) compared with usual care. Practically, it is hard to get c...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
My thinking is that the LDL Target should be at least 50, if not lower. I don't see setting an arbitrary goal of 70 being adequate. I think there's likely benefit to additional lowering, maybe not linear, but at least additive.
Yes, I think trying to impress this upon patients is difficult, but when...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer