Mednet Logo

Would you consider omitting adjuvant durvalumab in MIBC to limit overtreatment in patients who may not benefit or those who have achieved maximal benefit after neoadjuvant gem/cis/durva?

Community PollStarted

When, if ever, would you omit adjuvant durvalumab after using neoadjuvant gem/cis/durva for bladder cancer?

75 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

4 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles
Answered on

The NIAGARA protocol included neoadjuvant durvalumab in combination cisplatin/gemcitabine, followed by adjuvant durvalumab regardless of the pathologic response at the time of surgery. Therefore, even those with pCR completed the year of adjuvant therapy. What is important to point out is that we do...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · University of California San Francisco
Answered on

The design of the NIAGARA study does not address the question regarding the relative contributions of neoadjuvant vs adjuvant components of the treatment regimen. Specifically, it is unknown whether patients who achieve complete pathologic response (pCR) at the time of radical cystectomy necessarily...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Answered on

This is another unanswered question through the NIAGARA trial since all patients, including the ones who have pT0 after cystectomy, were treated with adjuvant durvalumab; hence, we do not know for sure if those patients are being overtreated. Historically speaking, patients with pT0 after neoadjuvan...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Mary Lanning Healthcare Morrison Cancer Center/University of Nebraska Medical Center Adjunct Faculty
Answered on · Updated on

In the phase 3 NIAGARA trial, while patients with a missing assessment of pathological complete response were considered to have had no response, the number of patients with a missing pathological complete response in both groups was not provided, thus limiting the ability to evaluate potential bias...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer