How do you interpret NIAGARA efficacy given that adjuvant nivolumab was not administered in the comparator arm?
Does the NIAGARA trial design, without direct comparison to adjuvant immunotherapy, impact your decision to utilize perioperative durvalumab?
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
The NIAGARA trial evaluated the role of durvalumab as neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The combination chemoimmunotherapy (cisplatin, gemcitabine, and durvalumab) was given for 3 months prior to radical cystectomy, followed by adjuvant durvalumab every 4 weeks...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
NIAGARA was designed and conducted prior to the approval/availability of adjuvant Nivolumab. We cannot compare the perioperative regimen of NIAGARA to adjuvant Nivolumab since the efficacy of the addition of Durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is reflected in the downstaging at the time of surgery c...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
This is an important question, unfortunately, one we do not have a clear answer to. The individual contributions of the neoadjuvant and adjuvant parts of a sandwich strategy are hard to tease out, as it's not a direct comparison of similar populations. In a recent analysis of patients in NIAGARA who...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer