Mednet Logo
HomeQuestion

How do you interpret NIAGARA efficacy given that adjuvant nivolumab was not administered in the comparator arm?

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

The NIAGARA trial evaluated the role of durvalumab as neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The combination chemoimmunotherapy (cisplatin, gemcitabine, and durvalumab) was given for 3 months prior to radical cystectomy, followed by adjuvant durvalumab every 4 weeks...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles

NIAGARA was designed and conducted prior to the approval/availability of adjuvant Nivolumab. We cannot compare the perioperative regimen of NIAGARA to adjuvant Nivolumab since the efficacy of the addition of Durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is reflected in the downstaging at the time of surgery c...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Mayo Clinic

This is an important question, unfortunately, one we do not have a clear answer to. The individual contributions of the neoadjuvant and adjuvant parts of a sandwich strategy are hard to tease out, as it's not a direct comparison of similar populations. In a recent analysis of patients in NIAGARA who...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

How do you interpret NIAGARA efficacy given that adjuvant nivolumab was not administered in the comparator arm? | Mednet