Would you initiate anti-arrhythmic drug therapy in patients who are asymptomatic and have normal LV function but with a PVC burden >20 percent?
In patients with a PVC burden > 20% who are asymptomatic and have normal LV function, what is your preferred management strategy?
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
In my younger days I've managed high-burden PVCs with minimal to no symptoms with a spectrum of strategies, including ablation (I've had a case of LVS PVC/VT ablation with late resolution akin to Candemir et al., PMID 30822513), BB, flecainide (case of resolved PVCs after medication holiday), and ob...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
I overall agree with Dr. @Dr. First Last's approach. There are important considerations with high-burden PVCs beyond LVEF. The morphology can be helpful with regard is this consistent or atypical appearance of idiopathic PVCs. I will typically do an assessment for underlying structural heart disease...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
I think these patients are better suited for ablation, to prevent VPC-induced LV dysfunction, which may occur at this level of burden. If they do not consider an invasive procedure, I would not treat, since they are asymptomatic and the risk of AAD is not worth the benefits. I would monitor their LV...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer