New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Do you recommend adjuvant radiation for a recurrent pT1bN0 vulvar carcinoma?

What factors would push towards treatment? The patient had recurrence of a pT1bN0 vulvar SCC within a year of original surgery. Re-resection shows again a pT1bN0 lesion, negative margins. NCCN says observe vs EBRT. How do you decide?
3 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network
Answered on

For recurrence disease, if the depth of invasion is more than 1 mm and nodal assessment is not done then would favor/discuss RT. Data shows with each recurrence, risk of nodal involvement (15%) goes up which is hard to salvage Grootenhuis et al., PMID 26428940.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Willis-Knighton Medical Center
Answered on

Unfortunately, recurrent vulvar cancers have a poor prognosis with salvage radiotherapy.

Early reports utilized radiation therapy often without chemosensitization and modern techniques.

More modern retrospective series demonstrate salvage rates of approximately 20%. Laliscia et al., PMID 26722070

As patients now often have fewer inguinal lymph node dissections and fewer aggressive primary vulvar surgeries, local failures will likely increase with field cancerization.

With IMRT-reduced toxicity and HPV-directed therapies likely on the horizon, I favor radiation therapy in these patients regardless of nodal evaluation, especially with proven HPV positivity which may potentially respond better to therapy. Woelber et al., PMID 34794839.

Due to t...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Answered on

Most true vulvar cancer recurrences (meaning disease along the post-op cavity, not a new primary within a separate portion of the vulva), even if re-excised, will have margins within 5 or 8 mm which is my usual threshold below which to recommend EBRT for LR benefit even in the upfront setting, albeit understanding the recent challenge from Netherlands group (Grootenhuis et al., PMID 31109660).

I have treated every recurrent vulvar cancer that I have seen (assuming no history of previous RT) in the adjuvant setting due to this margin threshold. I suppose if surgical margin on re-excision was truly > 8 mm then perhaps I could consider observing (again).

However, if dVIN at margin, the optimal answer is additional re-excision.

In my opinion, bett...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer