Mednet Logo

For APBI, do you prefer a brachytherapy or external beam technique?

What specific technique (i.e. interstitial vs intracavitary, 3DCRT vs IMRT) do you prefer? What do you consider to be the pros and cons with each approach?
3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh
Answered on

I offer a variety of PBI techniques depending on situation and patient preference.

With respect to external beam, I primarily utilize a 30 Gy/5 fraction regimen delivered with VMAT (2-3 coplanar arcs). We use breath hold regardless of laterality and CBCT to reduce motion and reduce PTV expansions. Th...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Washington University School of Medicine
Answered on

For APBI at WashU we lean towards external beam. Over the years, the fraction of APBI patients that we elected to treat with brachytherapy has gone down from about half of our APBI volume to less than 10% largely driven by factors that @Dr. First Last lists. For patients eligible for APBI, we will o...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Michigan Healthcare Professionals, PC
Answered on · Updated on

With guidance from @Dr. First Last, we have treated many patients this way in our community practice with confidence and good outcomes (albeit, very short follow up). BMDACC does use somewhat different CTV volumes than CCF (which are also different than Livi), but the technique is nearly identical. ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer