Mednet Logo

How do you define "low-volume" intermediate risk prostate cancer that is appropriate for brachytherapy alone?

Specifically, what criteria do you use to quantify "low-volume" prostate cancer? What other criteria do you consider when defining low volume intermediate risk prostate cancer that can be considered for bracthy monotherapy?
Community PollStarted

How do you define "low-volume" intermediate risk prostate cancer that is appropriate for brachytherapy alone?

27 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Baylor College Of Medicine
Answered on

For prostate cancer the use of PSA, T-stage, and Gleason score have been used to create multiple different risk stratification schemes. That of @Dr. First Last, the NCCN, and the AJCC are all very similar. In addition, other methods such as the Memorial Sloan Kettering nomograms and the CAPRA score ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · UCLA | VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
Answered on

@Dr. First Last has summed up the most relevant empiric evidence available to date. This provides the assurance that favorable-interm risk prostate cancers with good urinary function are generally good candidates for brachytherapy monotherapy. Yet, with regards to patients with more aggressive GS 7 ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine
Answered on

I would just say that probably any increase in risk factors increases risk. Perhaps even "secondary" gleason score, meaning if you had only a small core of G3+4 but the rest G3+3 your secondary score is 6 or if G4+3 but you had another G3+4 then your secondary is 3+4.

Also number of cores + is a mov...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer