Mednet Logo

How do you interpret the EBCTCG meta-analysis analyzing the magnitude of benefit of anthracyclines in early stage ER+ breast cancer?

How do you reconcile these findings with the ABC trials?
3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Answered on

The appreciation of studies testing the specific benefit of adding or substituting anthracyclines as adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer requires a historical overview (so my apologies for a very long response….). Several of the earlier trials comparing non-anthracycline therapies (primar...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Margie Petersen Breast Cancer Center
Answered on

For HR+ breast cancer, the benefit of anthracyclines in patients with less than 4 positive lymph nodes is very small and I tend to avoid it in that scenario. In triple negative breast cancer patients, there is a benefit to anthracyclines compared to TC but it remains to be seen whether that benefit ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida
Answered on

I agree with Dr. @Dr. First Last that the benefit of using anthracyclines in ER+ N0 or N1 disease is not making a significant difference. The EBCTCG manuscript states that the relative risk reduction of these chemotherapy treatments is roughly 30% of whatever absolute risk is left over after appropr...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer