Mednet Logo
CommunityRadiation Oncology

Is 60 Gy in 40 fractions BID an appropriate regimen to use for LS-SCLC now?

The recent randomized Phase II Scandinavian trial (Gronberg et al., PMID 33662285) showed a statistically significant increase in 2-year and median overall survival in small cell lung cancer patients treated with high-dose BID radiation (60 Gy in 40 fractions) as compared to standard dose BID radiation (45 Gy in 30 fractions). There was also no increase in toxicity with the higher dose. Has anyone here used this high-dose 60 Gy BID regimen? Would you consider it a reasonable regimen to use off protocol?
Community PollStarted

How will you incorporate 60 Gy in 40 fractions BID for LS-SCLC in your practice?

479 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

8 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center
Answered on

So as to answer the question and not to bury the lede: IMHO, yes.

Here's an XRT-style-vs-XRT-style trial showing a survival advantage. How rare is that in radiation oncology? There are probably less than 10 such trials in medical history (wild guess). I can't recall the last time that outright pure d...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Quillen VA Medical Center
Answered on

The reported results are very interesting and potentially practice changing. The 45 Gy BID was developed in 1983, doubted since then but undefeated in large prospective trials, including the RTOG/CALGB trial presented at ASCO. Its 5-week arm with partial 1.8 BID for part was dropped. Four weeks BID ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Answered on

My initial concern when this study was initially presented was the presence of an OS benefit with what seemed like no signal of PFS benefit.

In the full publication, while the PFS benefit is not statistically significant, there is some separation of curves after the first 6 months, although the p-val...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Colorado School of Medicine
Answered on

We now have two randomised studies (CONVERT and CALGB study) showing that a higher dose (66-70 Gy QD conventional fractionation) is not superior to 45 Gy BID. Usually, the decision to give QD vs BID treatment comes down to patient convenience. If a patient does not want to come BID then I recommend ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Michigan Healthcare Professionals, PC
Answered on

The paper was finally published. It is still very surprising to have the dose go up by 33%, yet toxicity doesn't change. We know that when we went from 45/25 qD to 45/30 BID, the acute esophagitis increased significantly. Now, we are going up to 60 Gy/40 BID, and no difference. In addition, neither ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · UMass Memorial Medical Group
Answered on · Updated on

The THORA trial results are certainly intriguing, but worthy of yet additional investigation and corroboration. In addition to previous comments about the OS benefit seen without a concomitant LC, PFS, or MFS benefit, there are a couple of other criticisms that have been leveled against this study t...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · St. Vincent Hospital
Answered on

Would not do until it becomes standard of care, WITH appropriately approved constraints and adequate follow-up data.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Fort Bend Medical and Diagnostic Center
Answered on

How does the updated paper influence you all with HD BID treatment? What about incorporating consolidation immuno, like ADRIATIC?

Grønberg et al., PMID 40258573

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer