Mednet Logo

Is it acceptable to do IFRT rather than whole posterior fossa boost for high risk medulloblastoma?

If so in what circumstances and what margin is acceptable? ACNS 0331 recently showed no difference in outcomes when comparing IFRTboost vs PF boost for standard risk but high risk medulloblastoma trials still do PF boost.
Community PollStarted

Which volume do you recommend?

57 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Answered on

Based on dosimetric patterns of failure and early pilot studies of tumor bed boost from the University of Michigan and Memorial Sloan Kettering, respectively, the recently completed ACNS0331 clinical trial randomized patients with average risk medulloblastoma to whole posterior fossa or tumor bed bo...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Mayo Clinic
Answered on

I agree completely with @Dr. First Last. I would like to add emphasis to his comment that high risk disease is very heterogeneous. I think it's very reasonable to perform a tumor bed boost if someone is high risk because of cells in CSF, probably Ok for an isolated leptomeningeal deposit in the spi...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Baylor College Of Medicine
Answered on

I also would concur. The emphasis on repeat imaging of the PF with MRI near to the time of boost is also very relevant. It is not uncommon for the PF resection cavity to evolve / collapse over time. As a result pre-surgical MRI along with an MRI taken near to the time of Boost are important. As patt...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer