International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2015-11-15
A Randomized Phase 2 Study Comparing 2 Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Schedules for Medically Inoperable Patients With Stage I Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: NRG Oncology RTOG 0915 (NCCTG N0927).   
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE
To compare 2 stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) schedules for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer to determine which produces the lowest rate of grade ≥3 protocol-specified adverse events (psAEs) at 1 year.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Patients with biopsy-proven peripheral (≥2 cm from the central bronchial tree) T1 or T2, N0 (clinically node negative by positron emission tomography), M0 tumors were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive either 34 Gy in 1 fraction (arm 1) or 48 Gy in 4 consecutive daily fractions (arm 2). Rigorous central accreditation and quality assurance confirmed treatment per protocol guidelines. This study was designed to detect a psAEs rate >17% at a 10% significance level (1-sided) and 90% power. Secondary endpoints included rates of primary tumor control (PC), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year. Designating the better of the 2 regimens was based on prespecified rules of psAEs and PC for each arm.
RESULTS
Ninety-four patients were accrued between September 2009 and March 2011. The median follow-up time was 30.2 months. Of 84 analyzable patients, 39 were in arm 1 and 45 in arm 2. Patient and tumor characteristics were balanced between arms. Four (10.3%) patients on arm 1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9%-24.2%) and 6 (13.3%) patients on arm 2 (95% CI 5.1%-26.8%) experienced psAEs. The 2-year OS rate was 61.3% (95% CI 44.2%-74.6%) for arm 1 patients and 77.7% (95% CI 62.5%-87.3%) for arm 2. The 2-year DFS was 56.4% (95% CI 39.6%-70.2%) for arm 1 and 71.1% (95% CI 55.5%-82.1%) for arm 2. The 1-year PC rate was 97.0% (95% CI 84.2%-99.9%) for arm 1 and 92.7% (95% CI 80.1%-98.5%) for arm 2.
CONCLUSIONS
34 Gy in 1 fraction met the prespecified criteria and, of the 2 schedules, warrants further clinical research.

Related Questions

Given the multiple retrospective studies showing benefit to higher BED fractionation schedules (most recently, http://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360...

Now that RTOG 0915 shows 5 year data with no difference in OS, DFS, and toxicity, should single tx be routinely offered? Are there specific  pati...

Any special dosing considerations or can you approach this like any other small peripheral NSCLC?

Does tumor location play a role (central vs peripheral) in making the decision?  The question stems from an oral presentation at ASTRO 2014 inves...

The TROG 13.01 SAFRON-II trial used a single 28 Gy fraction. When is it appropriate to use this fractionation?

Assume that the volume of the tumor is <10 cc (equivalent diameter of 2.7 cm). Assume there is not a significant amount of overlap of the PTV with ...