Mednet Logo

Abstract

Context

Carcinoma of the esophagus traditionally has been treated by surgery or radiation therapy (RT), but 5-year overall survival rates have been only 5% to 10%. We previously reported results of a study conducted from January 1986 to April 1990 of combined chemotherapy and RT vs RT alone when an interim analysis revealed significant benefit for combined therapy.

Objective

To report the long-term outcomes of a previously reported trial designed to determine if adding chemotherapy during RT improves the survival rate of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Design

Randomized controlled trial conducted 1985 to 1990 with follow-up of at least 5 years, followed by a prospective cohort study conducted between May 1990 and April 1991.

Setting

Multi-institution participation, ranging from tertiary academic referral centers to general community practices.

Patients

Patients had squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, T1-3 N0-1 M0, adequate renal and bone marrow reserve, and a Karnofsky score of at least 50. Interventions Combined modality therapy (n = 134): 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, plus cisplatin intravenously on the first day of weeks 1, 5, 8, and 11, and fluorouracil, 1 g/m2 per day by continuous infusion on the first 4 days of weeks 1, 5, 8, and 11. In the randomized study, combined therapy was compared with RT only (n = 62): 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 6.4 weeks.

Main outcome measures

Overall survival, patterns of failure, and toxic effects.

Results

Combined therapy significantly increased overall survival compared with RT alone. In the randomized part of the trial, at 5 years of follow-up the overall survival for combined therapy was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-37%) compared with 0% following RT. In the succeeding nonrandomized part, combined therapy produced a 5-year overall survival of 14% (95% CI, 6%-23%). Persistence of disease (despite therapy) was the most common mode of treatment failure; however, it was less common in the groups receiving combined therapy (34/130 [26%]) than in the group treated with RT only (23/62 [37%]). Severe acute toxic effects also were greater in the combined therapy groups. There were no significant differences in severe late toxic effects between the groups. However, chemotherapy could be administered as planned in only 89 (68%) of 130 patients (10% had life-threatening toxic effects with combined therapy vs 2% in the RT only group).

Conclusion

Combined therapy increases the survival of patients who have squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, T1-3 N0-1 M0, compared with RT alone.

Related Questions

How would you approach definitive RT for mid-esophageal cancer in a patient who declines or cannot get chemotherapy?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Florida

RT alone. 70/35. I know, stop at 50. Pall RT.

What dose regimen would you use to treat a patient with locally advanced esophageal SCC of the mid-esophagus who refuses chemo and surgery, agreeing only to radiation alone?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Michigan Healthcare Professionals, PC

The 5Y survival of RTOG 8501’s RT alone arm was 0%. They used 64/32 Gy. So... I tend to think that RT alone is purely palliative and generally stick with 40/15 to provide palliation and hopefully some local control. 50/25 not unreasonable, but please don’t use the RT alone arm of the chemoRT vs RT s...

How do you treat localized esophageal carcinoma in patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo chemotherapy or surgery?

4
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Fox Chase Cancer Center

This is a question that comes up occasionally in clinic. My viewpoint is generally based on the prospective data that we have. Of course, the RTOG 85-01 study showed 0% long-term OS with definitive RT vs CRT. Additionally, the Intergroup 0123 study showed no evidence of improvement with higher dose...

How do you manage unresectable esophageal cancer involving both the thoracic esophagus and GE junction?

1
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Oregon Health & Science University

We need to remember that RTOG-8501 treated the entire esophagus for the initial fields, so treating a large field is not unheard of. With modern day treatment planning and delivery, it would be reasonable to treat definitely to treat the entire CTV (defined as the esophagus and nodes) to 45 Gy and t...