Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2000-04
Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix.
Abstract
Purpose
To determine whether the addition of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT) to pelvic radiation therapy (RT) will improve the survival of early-stage, high-risk patients with cervical carcinoma.
Patients and methods
Patients with clinical stage IA(2), IB, and IIA carcinoma of the cervix, initially treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and who had positive pelvic lymph nodes and/or positive margins and/or microscopic involvement of the parametrium were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized to receive RT or RT + CT. Patients in each group received 49.3 GY RT in 29 fractions to a standard pelvic field. Chemotherapy consisted of bolus cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) and a 96-hour infusion of fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m(2)/d every 3 weeks for four cycles, with the first and second cycles given concurrent to RT.
Results
Between 1991 and 1996, 268 patients were entered onto the study. Two hundred forty-three patients were assessable (127 RT + CT patients and 116 RT patients). Progression-free and overall survival are significantly improved in the patients receiving CT. The hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival in the RT only arm versus the RT + CT arm are 2.01 (P =.003) and 1.96 (P =. 007), respectively. The projected progression-free survivals at 4 years is 63% with RT and 80% with RT + CT. The projected overall survival rate at 4 years is 71% with RT and 81% with RT + CT. Grades 3 and 4 hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity were more frequent in the RT + CT group.
Conclusion
The addition of concurrent cisplatin-based CT to RT significantly improves progression-free and overall survival for high-risk, early-stage patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the cervix.
Related Questions
Would you offer any adjuvant therapy for cervical cancer following total pelvic exenteration in the setting of a positive pelvic lymph node?
I am going to "eat a bit of crow" here and admit to having been schooled a bit by the esteemed Dr. @Dr. First Last. I admit to having immediately jumped to the post-rad hyst situation rather than post-exenteration, and I agree that the radicality of the operation could factor into the decision about...
In cervical cancer, is the presence of parametrial LNs with ITCs considered parametrial disease requiring adjuvant chemo +/- RT?
Depending on the patient's general condition and performance status, I would consider adjuvant treatment with chemoradiation. In this case, although there was a good pelvic lymph node dissection with 29 negative right and left pelvic nodes, there are positive parametrial nodes with ITC. One could co...
When would you consider sequential chemotherapy and radiation rather than concurrent for early stage cervical cancer with high risk pathologic features?
How much of the results of the STARS (Huang et al., PMID 33443541) (showing improved DFS with SCRT compared to CCRT) driven by only a 62% completion rate of CCRT (compared to 73.4% in SCRT, p< 0.001) as per the specified protocol is unknown.While the authors state within their results section that t...
What are your next steps in management for a patient with endocervical adenocarcinoma s/p radical trachelectomy with a positive pelvic lymph node noted on final pathology?
With any surgically resected cervical cancer (whether nodal assessment followed a traditional approach/radical hysterectomy or nodal assessment followed by a fertility sparing approach/radical trachelectomy), when there are positive nodes on final pathology, our tumor board recommends following Pete...