The New England journal of medicine 2017-04-06
Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma.
Abstract
Background
High-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation has been the standard treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in adults up to 65 years of age. However, promising data on the use of combination therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) in this population have raised questions about the role and timing of transplantation.
Methods
We randomly assigned 700 patients with multiple myeloma to receive induction therapy with three cycles of RVD and then consolidation therapy with either five additional cycles of RVD (350 patients) or high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation followed by two additional cycles of RVD (350 patients). Patients in both groups received maintenance therapy with lenalidomide for 1 year. The primary end point was progression-free survival.
Results
Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the group that underwent transplantation than in the group that received RVD alone (50 months vs. 36 months; adjusted hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; P<0.001). This benefit was observed across all patient subgroups, including those stratified according to International Staging System stage and cytogenetic risk. The percentage of patients with a complete response was higher in the transplantation group than in the RVD-alone group (59% vs. 48%, P=0.03), as was the percentage of patients in whom minimal residual disease was not detected (79% vs. 65%, P<0.001). Overall survival at 4 years did not differ significantly between the transplantation group and the RVD-alone group (81% and 82%, respectively). The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was significantly higher in the transplantation group than in the RVD-alone group (92% vs. 47%), as were the rates of grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal disorders (28% vs. 7%) and infections (20% vs. 9%). No significant between-group differences were observed in the rates of treatment-related deaths, second primary cancers, thromboembolic events, and peripheral neuropathy.
Conclusions
Among adults with multiple myeloma, RVD therapy plus transplantation was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival than RVD therapy alone, but overall survival did not differ significantly between the two approaches. (Supported by Celgene and others; IFM 2009 Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01191060 .).
Related Questions
Are you still recommending autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for all eligible myeloma patients who achieve remission after induction with a quadruplet regimen?
Our institution still recommends upfront autologous transplant for most fit patients. We appreciate the recent results from CEPHEUS and BENEFIT, but if we believe that achieving MRD negativity is important, the addition of autologous transplant improves the rate of MRD negativity, which ultimately s...
How do you now approach treatment sequencing in MM in light of the DETERMINATION trial data?
There are two questions that come to mind re: DETERMINATION with respect to sequencing.1) To do early transplant or not?2) To do indefinite lenalidomide maintenance? My views on question #1 are evolving, but here is how I have unpacked it and stated elsewhere on theMednet. REASONS TO DO TRANSPLANT: ...
How do you approach the decision to pursue early versus delayed autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma?
An excellent discussion.Why do I have a feeling this will continue to be debated for the next decade?!Reasons to consider early transplant: Age > 65. These patients were not included in the IFM-2009 study that tried to answer this. Patients who defer transplant in this age range may never get to a t...
What is your preferred maintenance strategy for high risk multiple myeloma?
Ok. First off, what is high risk in the setting of maintenance therapy? I define high risk in this area as R-ISS 3 [incl t(14;20)], ≥ 5% circulating PCs, extramedullary disease [except salivary glands], hypodiploidy, or karyotypic t(8;22). We frequently argue about this definition since there is no ...
How do you treat newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with 1q gain?
There is still a lack of randomized phase 3 data demonstrating that KRD is superior to VRD for patients with high-risk cytogenetics. However, the recently presented ENDURANCE study only excluded t(14;20), t(14;16) and del(17p) and did include +1q (ASCO 2020 LBA3). The investigators did not report on...
In transplant-eligible, fit patients with primary refractory myeloma, what is the optimal timing for stem cell collection?
In fit patients with less than a partial response to induction therapy, i.e. primary refractory, the optimal timing for stem cell collection is NEVER. If they don't respond to three drug induction (proteasome inhibitor + IMiD + steroid), they are unlikely to respond durably to a standard high dose m...