What are the current appropriate planning margins for Wilms tumor in lymph node negative cases?
How should the need for dose homogeneity be managed relative to the proximity of these target volumes to the spine?
Are AREN0321(HR), 0532(VL/SR), 0533(HR), 0534(Bilat) guidelines preferred for target delineation [(kidney + preop GTV) + 1 cm to CTV + (0.5-1cm PTV)]
or
is the use of more recent target volume updates prescribed by AREN 1921 (CTV=GTV+0.5cm, PTV=CTV+0.5cm) & Terezakis' pediatric target volume delineation handbook acceptable for routine clinical use?
How close does the PTV need to be to approximate the vertebral body when considering coverage of the adjacent vertebral bodies to ensure appropriate dose inhomogeneity?
Option A: Exclude vertebral bodies to minimize size of treatment field, normal tissue exposure and thus potential late effects (2ndary malignancy, insulin resistance, etc.)
Option B: Include vertebral bodies along the entire field to prevent growth asymmetry (scoliosis)
Community PollStarted
Which one of the above images is correct assuming the aqua is the PTV? (independent of chosen target margins)
29 physicians have voted
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
1 Answer
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Answered on
I would recommend treating with the AREN1921 treatment volumes as these are the most updated version of the treatment guidelines. The block should extend 1cm beyond vertebral body. Always treat the entire LN chain.
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer