New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Would you consider reserving CDK4/6 Inhibitors as second line treatment in patients with advanced HR+ HER2 negative breast cancer given SONIA and PALMIRA trial results?

Community PollStarted

Will the SONIA trial impact your clinical use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer?

87 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University
Answered on

Yes - in fact, based on the SONIA trial results, I believe that 1st-line administration of a CDK 4/6 inhibitor in combination with an AI should be reserved for patients in whom a rapid response to treatment is necessary due to symptoms or extent of disease, particularly those with extensive visceral involvement. In the not uncommon patient who has de novo metastatic disease or a recurrence >24 months after discontinuing adjuvant endocrine therapy and has primarily soft tissue or bone disease (+/...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Avita Health System
Answered on · Updated on

I think the answer is incredibly difficult now. Patients who progress on first line endocrine therapy are increasingly getting options for second line. The patients on the SONIA trial that received CDK 4/6 up front received faslodex on progression. However, elacestrant is now approved and working well in patients with ESR1 mutations AND post CDK 4/6 (see abstract GS3-01 from SABCS). We also know faslodex does not do nearly as well in this space, and caution is needed as there can be a rapid 50% ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer