Mednet Logo
HomeNeurologyQuestion

Would you consider using DOACs as a bridge to warfarin instead of heparin or LMWH?

5
4 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Hunterdon Cardiovascular Associates

I would feel very comfortable bridging with apixaban, given its relatively short half-life and fairly quick absorption. I think it is very similar to bridging with Lovenox.

More importantly, it usually takes at least 24 hours until heparin IV gets to therapeutic levels - it is often too high or too ...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Hematology · Mayo Clinic

This is an interesting question. My bias would be to bridge back to warfarin under cover of IV unfractionated heparin. Each DOAC has a different elimination route with approximate renal elimination as follows: dabigatran: 80%; edoxaban: 50%; rivaroxaban: 33%; apixaban: 25% (Baker et al., PMID 392236...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Hematology · Medical University of South Carolina

After 3 months of anticoagulation for APSy, the estimated annual risk of VTE recurrence is about 5% max; this converts into ~0.01% risk/day. On the other hand, the serious bleeding risk with bridging is about 1-2% per day in patients with ESRD/HD (even in the setting of mechanical valve, the estimat...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Neurology · University of Virginia, School of Medicine

I think from a stroke prevention standpoint it depends on the etiology. If someone has a mechanical valve or anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome then this approach may not help significantly for prevention, since the trials in these conditions evaluating the efficacy of DOACs did not he...

Register or Sign In to see full answer