The Lancet. Oncology 2018-04
Addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BrighTNess): a randomised, phase 3 trial.
Abstract
Background
Although several randomised trials in patients with triple-negative breast cancer have shown that the addition of carboplatin, with or without poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, to neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases the likelihood of achieving a pathological complete response, the use of these therapies in this setting has remained controversial. The BrighTNess trial was designed to assess the addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.
Methods
We did a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (BrighTNess) across 145 sites in 15 countries. Patients aged 18 years and older with previously untreated histologically or cytologically confirmed clinical stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer, who were candidates for potentially curative surgery and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, were randomly assigned (2:1:1) by an interactive response technology system via permuted blocks (block size of four) within strata to receive one of three segment 1 regimens: paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for 12 doses) plus carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/mL per min, intravenously every 3 weeks, for four cycles) plus veliparib (50 mg orally, twice a day); paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus veliparib placebo (twice a day); or paclitaxel plus carboplatin placebo (every 3 weeks for four cycles) plus veliparib placebo. Following segment 1, all patients were assigned to segment 2 in which they received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide every 2-3 weeks for four cycles. Randomisation for segment 1 was stratified by germline BRCA mutation status, nodal stage, and planned schedule of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide administration. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response in breast and lymph nodes as determined by site pathologists following completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat and safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. These are the first results of an ongoing clinical trial; the data cutoff for the analyses presented was Dec 8, 2016. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02032277.
Findings
Between April 4, 2014, and March 18, 2016, 634 patients were randomly assigned: 316 to paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus veliparib, 160 to paclitaxel plus carboplatin, and 158 to paclitaxel alone. The proportion of patients who achieved a pathological complete response was higher in the paclitaxel, carboplatin, and veliparib group than in patients receiving paclitaxel alone (168 [53%] of 316 patients vs 49 [31%] of 158, p<0·0001), but not compared with patients receiving paclitaxel plus carboplatin (92 [58%] of 160 patients, p=0·36). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities, and serious adverse events were more common in patients receiving carboplatin, whereas veliparib did not substantially increase toxicity. The most common grade 3 or 4 events overall were neutropenia (352 [56%] of 628 patients), anaemia (180 [29%]), and thrombocytopenia (75 [12%]) through complete treatment, and febrile neutropenia (88 [15%] of 601 patients) during segment 2. The most common serious adverse events were febrile neutropenia (80 [13%] of 628 patients) and anaemia (20 [3%]).
Interpretation
Although the addition of veliparib and carboplatin to paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide improved the proportion of patients with triple-negative breast cancer who achieved a pathological complete response, the addition of veliparib to carboplatin and paclitaxel did not. Increased toxicities with the addition of carboplatin (with or without veliparib) to paclitaxel were manageable and did not substantially affect treatment delivery of paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Given the consistent results with previous studies, the addition of carboplatin appears to have a favourable risk to benefit profile and might be considered as a potential component of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk, triple-negative breast cancer.
Funding
AbbVie.
Related Questions
What adjuvant therapy would you recommend for a premenopausal woman with low ER+/PR+ (1-10%) HER2- pT1cN0 metaplastic breast cancer?
The rarity of the metaplastic subtype of breast cancer makes it difficult to provide an evidence-based answer regarding what is the "best" adjuvant treatment. About 70% of metaplastic tumors are TNBC and ER-low is a small subset of the remaining 20% with an ER+ epithelial component. In general, some...
Would you consider omitting platinum from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women > 50 years of age with localized triple negative breast cancer?
I would not use the results cited above from the >50 subgroup (which was just 30% of their study population) of the study from the Tata Memorial Centre to justify omission of carboplatin from the neoadjuvant regimen for TNBC in otherwise healthy patients over 50 with TNBC. There is compelling data f...
In patients who receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy for TNBC, how will you manage adjuvant treatment if they have a germline BRCA mutation?
For patients with clinically high risk early TNBC and germline PV in BRCA 1 or 2 undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy along with pembrolizumab, the course of adjuvant therapy will depend on pathologic response at surgery.For those with pCR - I would continue adjuvant pembrolizumab for patients who ar...
What chemotherapy backbone will you use with pembrolizumab in the neoadjuvant setting for triple negative breast cancer?
I don't have an answer to this, but just opinions. There are several decisions that we will need to make regarding how to best use immunotherapy, unfortunately without much data to guide us:1) What chemo backbone to use?2) Do we really need to continue pembro adjuvantly? If so, in whom? Everyone? On...
Would you treat a premenopausal woman with T2N0 ER-, PR+ (15-20%), HER2- breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy like a triple negative breast cancer?
Yes, I would treat this patient with neoadjuvant chemotherapy as I would for a "triple-negative" breast cancer as certainly the biopsy of an ER 0%, weakly PR positive tumor is similar. I would not send an OncoType on this tumor - if it was low or intermediate, I still would not trust this patient wo...
In what scenarios would you incorporate platinum for patients with localized TNBC?
In the neoadjuvant setting, I include a platinum - specifically carboplatin - in the chemo regimen in essentially all patients with TNBC. Not only have 3 randomized studies (CALGB 40603, BrighTNess and GeparSixto) demonstrated significantly higher pCR rates with addition of carboplatin, if you look ...
Do you incorporate carboplatin into the treatment for triple negative breast cancer?
In the neoadjuvant setting, I recommend the addition of carboplatin in all patients (unless medically contraindicated) with stage IIA or higher TNBC. There are now 3 randomized studies - CALGB 40603, GeparSixto and BrighTNess - that have demonstrated significantly higher pCR rates with carboplatin t...