New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Would you assume a diagnosis of metastatic recurrence and initiate therapy for a patient with history of locally advanced NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation who develops multiple enlarging lung nodules that are too small to biopsy?

Is there an advantage to early diagnosis and intervention versus observation until the nodules are amenable to percutaneous biopsy?
Community PollStarted

Would you assume a diagnosis of metastatic recurrence and initiate therapy for a patient with history of locally advanced NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation who develops multiple enlarging lung nodules that are too small to biopsy?

48 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

1 Answer
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Wexner Medical Center at The Ohio State University
Answered on

I don't believe that I can point to a study that will answer this question, so will revert to oncologic principles 101, namely that absent exceptional circumstances, we ought to biopsy first recurrence. In the question posed, that is following definitive (curative intent) chemoradiation (and now in most patients one year of durvalumab), we are moving from curative to palliative intent. This is (emotionally) an important distinction (although I acknowledge that watchful waiting is anxiety promoting). In Ohio particularly, we deal often with histoplasmosis (and I'm confident that there are similar issues in other areas of the country). The second/sub question in this post is whether there is an advantage to early diagnosis- while there is a g...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer