This question is a sign of the times as there is a broad debate about whether we should use AI in our daily work as clinicians and researchers. It could mean different things. For example, if I were offered software to help with contouring target volumes and OAR, I would use it as a first iteration ...

I used ChatGPT to help start a letter of recommendation for an individual. Due to the character limits, I was unable to post the subject's entire CV. Nevertheless, ChatGPT was able to scour the web on this individual and come up with a good template. Unfortunately, it incorrectly assigned leadership...

After spending a couple of years in research on medical applications of AI (including radiation therapy) >25 years ago, I happened on the following question: "Artificial intelligence? Why settle for artificial when you can have the real thing?" I am not convinced that 25 years of subsequent dev...

Contrarian view: The speed that this is developing at is as fast of a technological breakthrough that most of us have or will ever see in our lives. Finding errors in today’s ChatGPT responses is not exactly the metric we should be using. These apps are blasting through licensing exams (bar ...

I have occasionally used ChatGPT to help formulate an insurance rebuttal. It's a bit of an iterative process but probably faster than typing one up to that level of detail oneself. We do attempt to use AI OAR contouring - definitely requires edits but is frequently a good starting point, especially...